The Meeting Redesign Kit · on paper
In many meetings the turn goes to whoever claims it first. This kit changes how one recurring meeting hands out the floor, then checks after four meetings whether that helped. Nobody is being assessed. The meeting is.
Print it · free to use, copy and adapt · nothing to sign up for
Before changing who talks, decide what the hour is for. A meeting that exists to share news or keep people connected is not failing when it decides nothing, and it should not be judged as if it were a decision meeting. Pick one.
The change you pick below should serve that purpose, not a general idea of a good meeting.
Each of these changes who the turn belongs to. None of them asks anyone to become more confident, and none of them is an accommodation for particular people. They change the room.
Change A
Send positions, not an agenda.
Ask each person for two or three written lines on the main item before the meeting. Everyone arrives having already taken a turn, and the discussion starts from what people think rather than from who speaks first.
Change B
Name the opener — and not the most senior person.
Decide in advance who opens each substantial item. It costs nothing, and it removes the moment where the floor usually goes to whoever grabs it.
Change C
Ask one person a question on purpose.
Not “any thoughts?”, which is an open floor with a question mark. “You have run this three times — what breaks first?” hands a specific person a specific floor. Rotate who you ask.
Change D
Give disagreement a slot.
A few minutes near the end where objections are the expected contribution. Disagreeing becomes the thing the meeting asked for, rather than the brave thing someone had to volunteer.
| The meeting | |
|---|---|
| What it is for | |
| What I notice about the room (the room, never a person) | |
| The one change | |
| Who does it | |
| Starts on | |
| Check on (four meetings later) | |
| Contributors on a normal week, before (a number, never names) |
Something like this, in your own words:
“For the next four of these meetings we are going to try one thing: [the change]. It is about how the meeting hands out turns, not about anyone in it. After the fourth, we will look at whether it helped, and keep it, change it or drop it.”
Then decide: keep it, adjust it, or drop it and try another change.
It changes one thing about one meeting and looks at what followed. That is an observation about your meeting, not proof of anything larger — and it does not need to be. It is the meeting you have to run.
It also cannot tell you why a particular person is quiet. Some reasons have nothing to do with how the floor is handed out: workload, a conflict, trust, or a manager in the room. If the change does not help, that is worth knowing too.
The Meeting Redesign Kit — grantedattention.com/meeting-kit · Clint Miller · free to use, copy and adapt