The Route Audit · on paper
Every route that brings attention to your work is one of three things. Two questions tell you which — and the order they are asked in is the whole method.
Print it · free to copy, use and teach · no account, and nothing to log into
First, list your routes. Not platforms — routes. The specific ways attention actually reaches your work: a feed, a mailing list, an agent, a venue, a marketplace, a search result, a person who keeps recommending you. Write down every one that matters, including the ones you would rather not think about.
Then ask these two questions of each, in this order.
Question one
When someone shows up here, had they already chosen you?
Did they come looking for you, or agree in advance to receive this — or did your work have to win them in the moment, against everything else competing for the same seconds?
Question two · only if question one was yes
Could you reach them again without this intermediary choosing you again?
Two parts. Can you start the next contact yourself — and if you had to change provider tomorrow, would the route survive the move? Ordinary infrastructure you can replace does not count as a landlord.
Direct
They arrived oriented toward you, and you control a route back that you could move to another provider without starting over. Less dependent on one intermediary — not lighter, and not a claim to own anyone.
Question one: yes · Question two: yes
Rented
They arrived oriented toward you — they chose you, or someone they trust pointed at you — but an intermediary controls the way back. Real attention, often excellent leverage. Rented names a dependency, not a mistake.
Question one: yes · Question two: no
Contested
Nobody arrived with a reason to listen to you specifically. The work has to win the hearing here, every time. That is how unfamiliar work gets discovered.
Question one: no · (question two does not apply)
| Route | Chose you? | Reach again? | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
Then, next to each, write roughly how much of your working attention it takes. Not time on the platform — total cost: making for it, posting, replying, reading the numbers, and thinking about it when you are not doing it. The comparison that matters is where the effort goes against which routes you could move.
This instrument places a route. It does not price one. For every route that came out rented, the next questions are:
A route can be worth renting after all three answers. The point is to have answered them.
The same two questions, in three fields. Yours will differ — these are here to show the shape of the reasoning, not to tell you where your routes land.
The middle row is the one worth sitting with. Being thought of is real conferral — someone chose you before the room did. The dependency is that the route back runs through people who can stop choosing you, and often without telling you they have.
A staff column can be excellent, well paid and rented at the same time. The lease shows up when the section closes, the editor moves, or the outlet changes what it wants — and the readers stay with the publication.
A large streaming number and a small direct one is a common shape, and it is not a failure. It does mean the routes carrying the volume and the routes you could move are not the same routes.
It places your routes. It does not measure your career. It cannot see the quality of your work, your income, your craft, your credits or your reputation — and rented routes build all of those, even when they build no way back to anyone.
A direct route can also still be a one-sided relationship. People can feel they know you in a way you do not reciprocate, and an audience like that carries its own weight — obligation, the expectation of availability, and the sense that changing direction is a betrayal. Direct removes the landlord. It does not remove the weight, it is not automatically healthier, and this instrument cannot tell the difference.
The Route Audit — grantedattention.com/route-audit/one-pager · Clint Miller · free to copy, use and teach